How can you be sure of that? And how can you make decision
that your research is the truth? Did you make a good research also from the
other side, or was it enough what Armenian did say to you ? It was made in the
war years all this propaganda, fake books and articles were published, an
excuse for invasion, for war. After the war, Britains agreed that the blue book
was a propaganda book...link
Malta court in 1921, when Ottoman empire was under invasion,
all the archives of Ottoman was under their hand, and yet, Americans nor the
Britain's couldn't find any documents about genocide of Armenians. Everthing
was political.
The Malta court decided that the Turks were not guilty and the
case was closed in 1921.
The parliaments can not decided wat it is, Armenian should
bring it, if there is a genocide, to the court of Turkey, if they can not get an
answer, they can move to European court. But they don't do that, because
archives are on our side..thus it is political.
Sukru Aya revealed all these frauds. Free E-Book :
"Genocide Of Truth" by Sukru Server Aya,
Based On Neutral or
Anti-Turkish Sources
In 1985 , 69 American scholars, academics sent a statement
to DC "there is no Armenian genocide"
some of them was threatened by Armenians, homes have been bombed.
Do you know how many Turkish Diplomats were killed by
Armenian terrorists Asala? Below are 27 attacks against Turkish diplomats by
Armenian terrorists during 1980s.
January 27, 1973 - Santa Barbara, California, United States:
Gourgen Yanikian, an elderly U.S. citizen of Armenian
origin, assassinates
Los Angeles Turkish Consul General, Mehmet Baydar, and
Vice Consul, Bahadir Demir.
Armenian Atrocites and Terrorism: pdf:
Or, how many Armenians live in Turkey? Many, some legal some
not, but they live. Well how many Turks live in Armenia, in Yerevan, which was
once a Turkish city? ZERO.
"The Armenian rebels were particularly successful in
the City of Van, the largest city of southeastern Anatolia. They seized Van
from the Ottomans and held it until the Russians arrived. When the Armenians
seized Van they killed every Muslim who could not escape. Those Muslims were
mainly Kurds. The Kurds in the countryside retaliated by killing every Armenian
they could find, just as Armenian bands killed all the Muslims they could. At
the end of the war, retreating Armenians, who had finally lost to the Turks,
killed all the Turks they could find on their line of retreat and filled the
streets of the cities of northeastern Anatolia with corpses. In turn, the
Turkish peasants who found Armenians killed them.
The Armenians of Anatolia, most of whom lived in war zones,
lost 40% of their population. The Muslims in the war-torn provinces of the East
lost almost exactly the same proportion of their population, 40%. Both Muslims
and Armenians in the war zone died from war between the Ottomans and Russians,
from starvation and disease, and by killing each other.
Armenian losses in World War I are often cited, but Muslim
losses are seldom mentioned outside of Turkey. The horrible word genocide is
often used against the Turks, even though no one has ever shown any real
Ottoman order to deliberately eradicate Armenians. Claims against the Turks
were believed in America because of prejudice against non-Christians, but
mainly because the other side’s story was never told. Even today, few know of
the equal suffering of the Muslims in that terrible war. When only the deaths
on one side in a war are known a mutual slaughter appears to be a genocide. It
is far better to study and pity the inhumanity of those times than to lay blame
on one side or the other."
The following excerpt from "The Armenian File — The
Myth of Innocence Exposed" by Kamuran Gürün
sheds convincing light on the
number of Armenians killed during the time of the Armenian
"Genocide."
Archives of Turkey are open for every scholar who wants to
work, but archives of Armenia or closed, even Boston archives. "Ottoman
Archives are Fully open”
Mehmet Perincek worked in Russian archives :
Russian Archives "Prove": NO GENOCIDE: link:
Historical Evidence Proves There Was No Armenian Genocide
read
and
Do you want to know what happened, or have you already
decided to take part in running this political game? How would you feel about
having to send your children to any school if lies are taught about your
people's heritage?.....
And: Khojaly.....a Azerbaijan city (if you don't know ,I
will say: they are Turkish people)
Justice for Khojaly in 1992 - the Bloody slaughter of
Khojaly Turks by Armenian troops :
""British reporter Thomas De Waal interview with
Sarkisian . Serge Sarkisian, long-time Defense Minister and Chairman of Security
Council of Armenia who is the current president of Armenia: “Before Khojali,
the Azerbaijanis thought that were joking with them, they thought that the
Armenians were people who could not raise their hands against the civilian
population. We were able to break that." . De Waal : "Serge Sarkisian
does not deny !" ""
Echo of Khojaly-Foreign Mass Media Briefly
about Khojaly
Besides Armenia is not their real name it is Hay-Hayk.
How Hays became Armenians? Historical background.
Who is in
hostile and aggressive behavoir?
"Armenian burnded Turkish Flag" watch
Demands : read
We are not amplified by hate, we bury our pain inside. Yes,
from both sides people died, but that was not a genocide of Armenians, instead
it was Turkish genocide. Many mass graves are found that belongs to the Turks,
and there is no mass grave that belongs to the Armenians. Turks Offer Help to
Excavate Alleged Mass Armenian Grave: link
Professor Justin McCarthy,Historian at the University of
Louisville,
and Mr. Bruce Fein, US lawyer specializing in constitutional
and international law, who served as an advisor to the former US President
Ronald Reagan; CTC Press Conference
"The current Republic of Armenia was formed only at the beginning of the last century, and more specifically - in 1918. May 26, 1918, when the Transcaucasian Sejm decided to disband. On the same day was proclaimed the independence of Georgia and Azerbaijan on May 28 announced the fraction of Azerbaijan's independence. The Armenian fraction of the Diet was no territory and population. Even in any county in any police station in Georgia and Azerbaijan, Armenians did not constitute a majority of the population.
But at that time, the Armenian government faction begged Fatalihana Khoysky give them a piece of land for self-determination of the Armenian people and the establishment of the state, the Armenian terrorist gang led by Andranik, Dro, and other Amazapsom brutally destroyed the Muslim population throughout Azerbaijan, particularly in the Erivan Province . And the Armenian propaganda in the capitals of Europe and the United States drew the image of "long-suffering people" and thus skillfully played on the religious feelings. She presented the Armenians all higher state and spiritual reasons in Europe and the United States as a nation, "the first to adopt Christianity." From court to court, from the office to the office they solicited funds for the Armenian bands and begged for help in the creation of the Armenian state.
The victorious countries in World War I, through their representatives informed the government F. Khoyski that providing Armenians Erivan and some adjacent areas could serve as a recognition of the independence of Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. These conditions of the Entente Prime Minister Khoyski tabled in the National Council of ADRs May 29, 1918. Several deputies led by Vice Speaker Gasanbekov Agaevym categorically opposed these conditions. But in the end serious conditions Entente aimed at the dismemberment of the territory of Azerbaijan were adopted (TSGAOR Azerb. Republic. F.907, OP.1, hr.1, l.5).
Also present another document confirming the act of giving Erivan Armenians:
Directive chairman of the Council of Ministers F. X. Khoysky Foreign Minister MG Hadjinsky sending dispatches the declaration of independence of Azerbaijan." ..... read in Russian language
An answer to a journalist about violates ceasefire, from President Aliyev: "They invade our territory, violating international law, they committed genocide in Khojaly. They ruined our historical and religious monuments and they blame us! The question must ask as:- What are Armenian troops doing here? What are they doing in occupied lands of Azerbaijan? If he does not want to die, then let him go to Yerevan. What are they doing in Agdam or Fuzuli? There is many room in their country, because many Armenians left Armenia." . Agdam and Fuzuli belongs to Azerbaijan, and these territories are under occupation by Armenia. ...link to read
Yes Yerevan is older but, history of Armenia (Haykistan) begins at the 6th c BC in that region. Subar Turks, Scythian/Saka Turks, Parthian Turks, As Turks was already there. Must read more to understand.
Turkish history is much older than you think! If Turkish language have influence on Akkadian language...
Akkadian, although a dead language, has left deep imprints on Semitic and some Indo-European languages, and has played an important role in the history of mankind. It is accepted as the ancestor of all the Semitic languages. Beginning from the era of Sargon I, it became the official language in a vast area from Anatolia to Egypt and to India. Akkadian was the "Lingua Franca" of the ancient world, and has passed on many words to other languages such as Persina, Sanskrit and Greek. Although, Assyriologists at present ignore it,the lnaguage spoken in the very days of Akkad, in BCE 28-24, may have been an agglutinative language like today's Turkish or Magyar, rather than an inflective language like today's Arabic and all Syriac languages.Thus it may show parallelism with Turkish.
Elşad Alili - Institution of Linguistics, Azerbaijan; Osman Çataloluk - Department of Archeogenetics, Turkey
Similarity Between Turkish & Akkadian Based on Rules of Inflective Agglutinative Languages ; AL&LS Advances in Language and Literary Studies... link for the international journal 2014 :
.
"As previously reported, in Moscow completed its international scientific conference "ethnogenesis, history, language and culture of Karachai-Balkar people", held in Moscow Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology. NNMiklukho Maclay of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
The conference was attended by about 400 people from 16 countries, including scientists from Azerbaijan. The conference discussed the most important issues of Turkish history, special attention is paid to the history of the Turkic peoples of the Caucasus.
On the final day of the conference voted unanimously for a resolution presented by the Azerbaijani scientists, leading researcher at the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan, PhD on the history of Zaur Hasanov. As noted in an interview Z.Gasanov APA, resolution refuted scientifically erroneous opinion that all the Scythians spoke only one Iranian language. The scientist said: "From the point of view of the participants as part of the Scythian Empire were tribes speaking different languages, including Turkish. The decision of the conference is a collective scientific support for the view that the rights of the vast Scythian Empire "Royal Scythians" were a Turkic ethnic group. They created their own state in the Caucasus 2700 years ago. Thus, Ancient history begins with the Scythians and other related peoples, such as the Cimmerians, Sakas, Sarmatians, Alans. " .... news in Russian language
.
The Legacy of Scythians by Valentyn Stetsiuk,Ukraine
All these linguistic findings combined with archaeological artifacts allow to confirm that Scythian had Turkic origin and modern Chuvashs are Scytians descendants....link
.
"The history of a people need to be read, a bit of by looking at the writings of his enemies."
L.N.Gumilev
The truth, it can be hurtful….
SB
