11 Aralık 2014 Perşembe

Fabricated History ; Armenian

Attention to the Peoples who is Fabricating the History;

Scythian-Saka-Parthians-Hun are the ancestors of today's Turks

Herodotus wrote about their daily life, which is the same as Turkish Culture... 

Mares' milk drinking, sacrifice and eating horse, burials with horses, Stone Statues (Tashbaba-Taşbaba and Balbal), Parthian shots, names, language, traditions....etc. 

Anna Komnena (Comnena,in "Alexiad" daughter of East Roman Emperor Alexios), called Turkic Pechenegs "Scythians": "Pecheneg mercenaries were known as Scythians.".... Anna Comnena remarks that the Pechenegs speak the same language as the Komans/Kumans/Cumans - Kipchaq/Kipchak Turks.

Attaleiates efers consistently to the Pechenegs (in Russian language Patzinak) in Paristrion as "Scythians near the Danube", while reserving the more general term "Scythias" for all Pechenegs living both north and south of the Danube. He also knows and uses the name "Patzinakai" which may have been used by the local population . (Attaleiates, Historia (The History) (11th c), historian,scholar)

PECHENEGS, Peçenek / Bechenak / Pechenak, one of the OGHUZ Turkish tribal confederation of mediaeval central and western Eurasia. Same root as Seljuk and Ottoman Turks...


link  /  link  /  link

"In 1000 BC these tribes were divided. A number of Oghuz tribe, had relationschip with the Indo-European language, and over time this Oghuz tribes become known as Ogur Turks. Ogurs are the progenitors of the Huns." - Prof.Yegorov Nikolay İvanoviç-historian, Chuvashia....

M. Vizantiyets says , Old Turks are named as "Saka" and for the Byzantine Emperor II Justianus, the agreement letter send by Göktürks (for Sasanian peace) ,was written in the Scythian language, known as the "barbarian Turks"....

In 1855 another German scientist K.Neumann, coming from the same religious and linguistic considerations, asserts that Scythians were Türks...

Bizantium historic Menander Protector (V-VI) says: "The Turks, in antiquity called Sakas" (XIX fragment)...

Especially Russian Academy of Sciences, in many of the academy, Kazan Tatar Turks M.F.Zakiyeviç says , "from the second half of the 18th century, they started to become interested in the history of the Greek, of which A. Lızlov (the first edition of his book in 1692) indicates that the Turks and Tartars came from the Scythians" 

"Given the archeological, philological and historical proofs and the Sumerian-Scythian and Avaricetymologies already published by other researchers, with the present study that fills the “Hunnic gap”in the Scythian-Hun-Avar-Magyar ethno-linguistic continuity, there cannot be any serious doubt anymore that the Hungarian Continuity Theory (HCT) is a historical truth and not a nationalistic-ideological phantasy..." Prof.Alfred Toth, Hungarian   pdf:

In history, a tribe or ethnic group, using the same name for 4500 / 3000 / 2000 years...imposible . It changes. Even if we go back for 500 years....Today, people of Turkey are not called as Ottomans or Seljuks, but Turks. Or just 20 years ago ; Yugoslavians doesn't exist anymore....

Of course Armenians exists today, but back in time, their name was not armenian it was Hayk. Armenia was a geographical name. Armenian language is IE, 

Parthians, Scythians, Saka, Urartians, Hurrrian, Sumerian language it is neither an Indo-European language nor a Semitic language. And Hittite used Hattian language, also called Hattic/Khattic or Khattish, non-Indo-European language of ancient Anatolia. So language don't fit your theory....

Carved gravestones in the form of rams, sheep and horses were common in Anatolia, especially in the eastern and southern regions. They are known from the examples still in situ at burial sites in the vicinities of Tunceli, Akşehir, Afyon, Seyhitgazi and Ahlat, as well as from examples now housed in local museums, including those at Diyarbakır, Elazığ, Erzurum, Kars and Van. Such grave markers are also known from sites in Georgia and Azerbaijan.

They are attributed to members of the Qaraqoyunlu ('Black Sheep') and Aq-Qoyunlu ('White Sheep') Turkmen confederations because rams and sheep were central to the economic currency of these pastoralist nomadic groups, and sculptures of them were probably symbols of social status. Relief carvings of weapons or imagery suggestive of hunting presumably referred to those skills of the deceased that were valued among pastoralist groups.


"The largest khachkar cemetary in the world was located in Jugha (located today in Nakhichevan, Azerbaijan). Khachkars (in Armenian, literally meaning "cross-stone") are a uniquely Armenian form of art, which evolved into incredibly ornate form which reached its peak in the 12-13th centuries. Khachkars are most commonly used as tombstones, but were sometimes used as memorials. The biggest khachkar cemetery in Armenia is the Noratus Cemetery, while the biggest in the world is in Jugha, in Nakhichevan."


1 - Khachkar is Turkish ; meaning Ram-Goat in Kıpchak Turkish - Kaç

2 - Nakhichevan is Turkish Land.
3 - Turks are not only Moslims but also Christians and Jews....
4 - Not Armenian art, but Turkish art ; look at Ahlat-Orkhon-Deer Stone Statues.
5 - Armenia was a Turkish land before they get a state. Yerevan was ones a Turkish city.

"...the lands of modern Armenia (‘Hayastan’) were basically inhabited by Turkic tribes Azer/Azar, Ermen (not Hays!), Saqa-Kimmers (Saga-Gamer), Bulgar, Subar-Sabir and others who initially were Tengrians (Tengrianity – Turkic monotheism) and turned into Christianity before adoption of Islam ...Today Hays (Armenians) claim these Christian architectural models (churches, chapels, monasteries etc) as theirs...."

You do not agree Istanbul or Azerbaijan research, why? Why shall we agree to Armenian research then? Armenian history is Fabricated and full of Falsifications. These are not our opinion, these are the facts. We offer you a foreign sources, but you don't even look at and you called as "medival ages". History was changed after they found out that the Turks are a huge family and civilizated people. The "west" had nothing. 

You are brainwashed with lies, "emptymined", don't accept another idea or opinion, which comes from Russian, Hungarian, Chineese, East Roman, Kazakhstan, etc. resources.You attack immediately when we put infront of you. Always insulting, can you not speak properly? No, that's the nature of you all. And you are also distorting our words, the sources says different then what you implying about history. So read some books and articles. We gave you everything, and we can send more. 

"The history of a people need to be read, a bit of by looking at the writings of his enemies."

R ratio is Turkish - have two sons R1a- R1b ., mtDNA can change in time , but the Y-DNA not! Etruscan's DNA match %99 with the TURKISH People.

"30 percent of Greeks, Bulgarians, 24 percent of Serbs who do not like us at all, 35 percent of Armenians who do not like us also, 40 per cent of Britons and Germans , 99,7 percent of Basques is Turkish origin. Today, 51 percent of the Europeans is Turkish origin. Kurgan Culture is Turkish Culture. the first Europeans were not Homo-Sapiens, it was Cro Magnon ! Homo sapiens entered in 16.000 BC. with R1a in Europe . This is a very simple and naked truth. the culture, historic, archeology and linguistic researchers must work together. - Doç.Dr.Osman Çataloluk - Molecular Geneticist  link   /  link 

Genetic Origins of the proto Turkic Peoples and their Relatives National Geographics: On video at 4:09 he says Turke...but the "west" ignore

Skeletons from the 3rd century B.C. to the 2nd century A.D. the most recent graves also contained DNA sequences similar to those in people from present-day

Chinees called the Huns "White Huns - Akhun" because of the color of their skin... 

There is only 5 races on earth. Capoid (black), Congoid (negroid), Mongoloid (yellow) , Australoid and Caucasoid (white-Caucasian- Europid) .... and The Turks are in the "White Race - Caucasoid/Europid " ....

"Atilla's own nation were Scythians"- and There is no doubt that the Huns are Turk.

"Turks possess one of the oldest cultures and civilizations in the world. It is hard to precisely specify the beginning of Turkish history. There is plenty of scientific evidence proving this linkage, most notably among archaeological findings obtained from the Pazyryk and Issyk mounds. [...]. It is reckoned that the culture of Andronovo was created by the ancestors of the Turks, who were white, horse-riders and warriors having spherical heads...

History of Uzbekistan in archeological and written sources ”FAN”, Tashkent 2005

What did you say about "Turanian is invented by Max Müller in the 19th century".... Well He says also that there are three language family : Turanian, Semitic and Arian...

Turanian means in Persian "The land of Tur" ..."Tur - Tar " is the word where "Turk" comes from. It comes in Avesta book "Turanians or Tuiryas", which is 700 BC...

So Max Müller did'nt invented the word "Turanian"... and Tur was already in use before the Persians came .... we see  in Assyrian tablets the word "Tu-ur-ruk-ki".... 


There is no Indo-Europeans ; Thomas Young minted the term “Indo-European” in 1813. There is also no Indo-Iranian, Indo-Germanic and Aryan race... There is no Indo-European language too...Proto-Indo-European, that does not even exist!

If Indo-Europe is together, why on earth are the "Europeans" always enemy of Indo, and hostile and racist to them and have imperialism thoughts?


Linguists have determined that an original language union formed in the Middle Volga and Urals area from the Türkic ancestors of the Tatar, Bashkir and Chuvash languages, and from the Finno-Ugrian ancestors of the Mari, Udmurtian and Mordovian languages [Serebrennikov B.A., 1972; Zakiev M.Z., 1987, 176 - 182]. 

It means that specific features of some languages gradually penetrated into others in a long mutual influence. As a result the Türkic language of the Volga and Urals region under the impact of local Finno-Ugrian languages received some lexical, phonetical and grammatical features that distinguish it from the Türkic languages of other regions. Precisely as well the Finno-Ugrian languages of this region under the influence of the local Türkic languages received such features that distinguish them from Finno-Ugrian languages of other regions. 

Hence, the Türkic language of the Volga - Kama region (i.e. the language of the ancestors of Tatars, Bashkirs and Chuvashes) was formed in this region with colloquial features, versus of being introduced from other regions, for example, from Near East, from Middle East or from Central Asia etc. If to appraise that mutual influence of different groups of languages at the phonetics and grammar level gives appreciable results only after millenniums of contacts, it is compelling to recognize that the Volga - Kama language union of the Türkic and Finno-Ugrian languages was formed in the deep antiquity in the Scythian or pre-Scythian times. 

Since then remained the ethnolinguistic continuity in the development of the Tatar people in the Volga-Kama region , referred to differently in different time, because different tribes were leading in different times. To state it in other words, the ethnolinguistic structure of the Tatar people remained stable, despite of the repeated changes of the ethnonyms, though at different times it accepted in its fold a part of the new coming tribes, and assimilated among local Türks: at first the Common Türkic-speaking Bulgars, and then Tatars with Central Asiatic attributes of the language.

Kazan, 1995.

Some geographical names comes from Turkish Tribes,
 Like Siberia....
It comes from Sibir/Sabar/Suvar Turks
or Asia
comes from As Turks
"ia" meaning is "Land of As" "Land of Sibir"
And as you know if people immigrate, they take the geographical names with them.


A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian Or South-Indian Family of Languages by Robert Caldwell

"....My own theory is that the Dravidian languages occupy a position of their own between the languages of the Indo-European family and those of the Turanian or Scythian group- not quite a midway position, but one considerably nearer the latter than the former...." 

in 1864 British General-consul noted: "Azerbaijan is divided between Iran and Russia, and Eriwan, Nakhshewan, Karabagh, Ghenja, Shir wan, Shekky, Shamachy, Bakou, Koobeh, Salian and a portion of Talish is a part of Azerbaijan."  link

Parthian language it's Turkish of origin and Parthians are the Turks.
Sacas is a Turkish tribe. 
Armenians lives in a world of disinformation: link

Gregory the Illuminator and King Tiridates were Parthian of origin. Gregory son of Anak. Anak is a Turkmen name and today still using among the Turkmens: link


...In this region however Darius I set up his Behistun text in three languages, Persian, Semitic and Turanian. Hence Dr.Oppert supposes the "Proto-Medes" to have been a Turanian race, akin to the old population of Susa further south, and to the Akkadians.....Faits of Man - Forlong

If there is a Turkish influence on Akkadian language, that means Turks lived in that region:

Similarity Between Turkish & Akkadian Based on Rules of Inflective & Agglutinative Languages - Elşad Allili, Osman Çataloluk

Akkadian, although a dead language, has left deep imprints on Semitic and some Indo-European languages, and has played an important role in the history of mankind. It is accepted as the ancestor of all the Semitic languages. Beginning from the era of Sargon I, it became the official language in a vast area from Anatolia to Egypt and to India. Akkadian was the “Lingua Franca” of the ancient world, and has passed on many words to other languages such as Persian, Sanskrit and Greek. Although, Assyriologists at present ignore it, the language spoken in the very early days of Akkad, in BCE XXVIII-XXIV, may have been an agglutinative language like today’s Turkish or Magyar, rather than an inflective language like today’s Arabic and all Syriac languages. Thus it may show parallelism with Turkish. 

PLINY “NATURAL HISTORY” – Harvard University Press, vol. II (Libri III-VII); Reprinted:

Turks and Turks-Subars in Mesopotamia:
link   and  link

Scythians are Sakas and they Turks they even spoke Turkish: 
"Carthasis the brother of Scythian King"...but Carthasis is not a name, it is Kardashi (Kardeşi in Turkish) meaning is "His Brother". The Turks left everywhere his name, you can see that as a city name, river name, mountain name, etc..... link

Tanais is the goddess of river that belongs to the Scythian Turks. or; today's Amu Derya River, before Oxus - in Central Asia is coming from OĞUZ Turks - Oghuz/

"All these linguistic findings combined with archaeological artifacts allow to confirm that 
Scythian had Turkic origin and modern Chuvashs are Scytians descendants."

As noted in an interview with Z.Gasanov, the resolution is by scientific, it is misconception about that all Scythians spoke only Iranian language. The decision of the conference is a collective scientific support for the view that the Scythian Empire "Royal Scythians" were a Turkic ethnic group. 

(Как отметил З.Гасанов в интервью АзерТАдж , в резолюции опровергается научно ошибочное мнение о том, что все скифы говорили только на одном иранском языке. Решение конференции является коллективной научной поддержкой мнения о том, что правившие огромной Скифской империей «царские скифы» были тюркским этносом.)  link


The myth of Indo-European "cultural superiority": This myth was invented in the 19th c. and became the basis of the ideology of the Aryan master race....

Sumerians an "isolate" ethno-linguistic group: The significant cultural and ethno-linguistic influence exerted over large areas of Eurasia by the Sumerians and related Turanian peoples played a key role in the development of the Semitic, Indo-European, and Ural-Altaic ethno-linguistic groups...

Single-source origin of Indo-Europeans: So far all attempts at locating the presumed ancestral Indo-European homeland and to reconstruct the hypothetical ancestral Indo-European language have failed...

Scythians an "Iranian" people: The Scythians, Cimmerians, Sarmatians, Medes, and Parthians were therefore not originally Indo-European, they were Turanians...

Uralic and Altaic groups "not related": Indo-European linguists reject the possibility of a connection between the Uralic and Altaic ethno-linguistic groups. This is an unfounded assumption as the evidence indicates that the Uralic and Altaic groups were formed through ethno-linguistic convergence and hybridization with Turanian peoples such as the Sumerians and Scythians. The Uralic and Altaic groups therefore share common Turanian ethno-linguistic roots...

Existence of Turanian ethno-linguistic group dismissed: Based on the unsubstantiated claims that the Sumerians were an "isolate" ethno-linguistic group and that the Uralic and Altaic groups are "not related", Indo-European linguists deny the existence of an ancient Turanian ethno-linguistic group which included the Sumerians and the Scythians despite evidence to the contrary, evidence which they simply ignore or dismiss without valid justification.... link

(...) the Etruscans appear to be an original Turanian race which formed the underlying stratum of population over the whole world, and which cropped up, like the Basques in spain, in that part of Italy and Etruria."

"Like all Turanians, the Etruscans were a tomb-building race."

One of the factors to prove the Turkic origins of theTrojans is the Etruscan writings that has been deciphered by Prof. Chingiz Garasharli...

Although the preponderance of the scholarly judgement that pertains to the creators of Sredniy Stoh and Yamnaya cultures of which origins have subjected to many debates hitherto, considered to be proto-type of the culture known as Kurgan in historiography, sides with the notion that they had an Indo-European stock their ethnic identities are intrinsically far away from being solved. Stetsiuk who had evaluated this crux subject from an another perspective arrived at the conclusion that the main owners of the before-said cultures were people with Turkish language at the consequence of his respective researches. In this article, the author touches upon the most salient features of the mentioned cultures in the sketchy form without going into much detail and places Turkic urheimat in the northern Black sea steppes in the light of both cultures he categorically attributes to the Turks.

Aryan/Arian bullshit:

"earlier times Scythians are Turanians":
Historie Ancienne De L'Orient jusqu'aux mediques,Prof.François Lenormant ,Paris,1881 


Two books / Two Statues on the cover
Cimmerians and Scythians and Turkish Peoples History

Cleopatra, another daughter of Ptolemy Philometor married first to Alexander Balas, the usurper of the throne of Scythia...." 
Balas?! BALA?!

BALA means Child in Turkish:

"At this time the Massagetae were ruled by a queen, named Tomyris, who at the death of her husband, the late king, had mounted the throne." Herodotus (1:205) 

TOMRIS - Tomyris, historical person, was a queen who reigned over the Massagetae, a Turkic people of Central Asia (Azerbaijan ) , at approximately 530 BC. She "defeated and killed" the Persian emperor Cyrus the Great during his invasion and attempted conquest of her country. MASSAGETAE = SAKA = SCYTH = TURKS, TOMRİS IS A FEMALE NAME , 
To'maris - Hosila Rahimova ,
Özbekistan- Uzbekistan Turkish Tribe

Gagauz, Bulgarians Turks, Dobrujan Tatars, Turks of Greece, Cypriot Turks, Anatolian Turks, Iraqi Turkomans, Crimean Tatars, Azerbaijani Turks, Iranian Turks, Balkar and Karachay, Nogays, Kumuks, Uzbeks, Turkmens, Qazaqs, Karakalpaks, Kyrgyz, Uyghurs, Tatars, Bashkirs, Chuvash, Shors, Altay Kiji (which kiji means kişi/ person - russian called Altayskiye Kalmukıy), Telengit, Teleut, Tuba, Kumandi, Chalkandu, Khakas, Tuvans, Dukha Turks, Sakha (Yakuts), Dolgans, Kipchaks, Cumans, Pechenegs, Avars, Mamluks, Mughals, Huns/Xiongnus, Scythians/Saka, Parts, Sumerians, Suvar/Sabirs, Urartians, Hattians, Etruscans, Basques, etc... Many different "types" of Turks yes, but Turks are not Mongoloid...

Did you know : 

The rich written heritage created by the Gregorian Qypchaq community dwelling in Ukraine, Poland, Romania, Moldovia, Crimea, etc., especially in the cities of Lvov, Kamenets-Podolsk, and Lutsk in XVI-XVIIth Centuries was written between 1521 and 1669 in the Armenian alphabet but the Qypchaq language. These Qypchaq texts written in the Armenian alphabet are called, deliberately or indeliberately, Armenian-Qypchaq, Armenian-Qypchaq Monuments, or Written Monuments of Armenian-Qypchaq Languages in the scientific literature, and the community that created these works are called Armenian Qypchaqs, Qypchaq speaking Armenians, or Turkish speaking Armenians. And they are Turks that joined the Gregorian sect of Christianity... Everybody knows that Kıpchaks are Turks, they are with blue eyes and white skin... And blue eyes comes from one gene pool.... 

Armenians, who is been lying to the world, messing with the history, 
must look self in to the mirror !
The truth hurts my friend, sorry for that....